Saturday, July 20, 2013

A spacecraft that had no engines, no fuel, nor any apparent methods of propulsion, yet out-flew our fastest in 1947!

A spacecraft that had no engines, no fuel, nor any apparent methods of propulsion, yet out-flew our fastest in 1947!
Posted By: Bob [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 20-Jul-2013 01:13:47
 
How the 1947 Roswell UFO/ET crash and cover-up or "closure", as opposed to the current "DISCLOSURE" (dilemma) facing the US government came about, way back then . . . . . .
"Very few people knew that what was coming out of Foreign Technology during the early 1960s had some basis in a crash of a UFO that “officially” never took place.
Lives were distorted, careers destroyed, children frightened into submission by Army Counterintelligence bogeymen, businessmen in Roswell threatened with financial ruination and even worse if anybody told the story of what happened.
But they were all loyal Americans, and even though some might have had their doubts about hiding the truth, they went along with what the army wanted.
Many people have criticized the army and the government for maintaining the Roswell cover-up not only at the time but also through the years.
For that, I (author of this article and book, and former Pentagon Official, ret. Col. Philip L Corso) need to say a word in defense of what the army did.
It’s easy to criticize if you weren’t an adult back then or someone who didn’t understand the politics that governed our thinking at that point in American history.
We had not yet fully made the transition from a nation at war to a nation at peace." (. . . . . . snipped)
_____________________________________________

"And then there was Harry Truman, still reeling from his sudden ascendancy to the presidency, toughened into steel by his decision to drop the atomic bombs on Japan, and now faced with the monumental impact of a crash landing of a strange craft on American soil.
Was it Soviet? Did it belong to a foreign power? Was it hostile?
We simply didn’t know and weren’t about to say anything until we knew what it was.
Was it a flying saucer?
The last time a public announcement of a landing by extraterrestrials took place, even though it was entertainment, panic ensued.
In the aftermath of the war and the fears surrounding the Cold War, we didn’t want to risk another panic.
So the military recommended and the White House agreed to clam up.
Just like the secrecy surrounding the Manhattan Project, no word gets out.
And for the next fifty years that policy, once put into place, governed the behavior of the U.S. government and the military about the existence of UFOs and the crash at Roswell."
______________________________________________

"The crescent-shaped craft (description of the Roswell's 1947 crashed UFO) looked so uncomfortably like the German Horten wings our flyers had seen at the end of the war, that he (Lt. Gen. Nathan Twining) had to suspect the Germans had bumped into something we didn’t know about.
And his conversations with Wernher von Braun and Willy Ley at Alamogordo in the days after the crash confirmed this.
They didn’t want to be thought of as, but intimated that there was, a deeper story about what the Germans had engineered.
=============================================================
No, the similarity between the Horten' wing' and the craft they had pulled out of the arroyo (gully) - was no accident.
=============================================================

We always wondered how the Germans were able to incorporate such advanced technology into their weapons development in so short a time and during the Great Depression.
Did they have help?
Maybe we were now as lucky as the Germans and broke off a piece of this technology for ourselves." . . . . . .
The above quote was from: Lt. Gen. Nathan Twining of the AAF and then USAF Air Materiel Command (in 1947) and adviser (and eye-witness of the Roswell crash site) to Pres Harry Truman.
Above was excepted from ret. Col. Philip L Corso's book: "The Day After Roswell".
__________________________________________

Picture of a German (pre-WWII) Horten 'parabolic' (crescent-shaped) aircraft (glider).



Picture source:
http://www.century-of-flight.net/Aviation%20history/flying%20wings/Horten%20X.htm
____________________________________________________

Read more, if this is of interest to you, at:
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/dayafterroswell/dayafter.htm#contents
Bob
==>

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=282752


No comments: