A
Letter to America
October 27, 2012
AMERICA....OUR
STOLEN COUNTRY -
PART IV
The
Silent Media - Obama's
Protector
By
Robert Quinn
Truly
disgraceful is the non-reporting by the major media of the existence of many
lawsuits, encompassing plaintiffs of Caucasian, Black and Hispanic origin
who were or are challenging Obama's claim of
"natural-born"American citizenship.
What
the media gives us is best defined as silence. They even refused to run ads
challenging his eligibility. Hundreds of thousands of e-mail petitions were not
considered newsworthy; reporters were chastened for bringing up the subject at
Obama's news conferences.; all major TV stations hitting the "mute" button
on this issue, including one which (sadly) had repeatedly portrayed itself as
"fair and balanced." Media malpractice gone wild!
Recently,
a CBS nationwide advertising site subsidiary refused to lease any site to World Net Daily for electronic signposts which simply
read "Where's the Birth Certificate ?" Four simple words, yet CBS knew they pertained to Obama. Truly, a
guilty conscience needs no accuser.
Article I
of our Constitution gave the Press the right to reveal,not conceal
news of interest to the American People yet fear of disclosure of Obama's true
eligibility status has permeated the Mainstream Media to this day. For almost
four years they have been silent on this issue. Even the Fox Network, though
vocally critical of the "Stimulus" plans, "Czar"
appointees, etc.will not mention the existence of eligibility lawsuits
presently in the courts.
Bill
O'Reilly of Fox claimed he saw a valid Obama birth certificate but had to retract his claim when
informed that what Fox News actually viewed was a fraudulent
"Certification of Live Birth" , not a "Certificate of Live
Birth", the required document for legitimizing his Presidential
eligibility. O'Reilly also said that the two newspaper clippings reporting
Obama's "supposed" birth in Hawaii confirmed his eligibility. Three
years later, even after being made aware that in 1961 anyone could have
prepared an Hawaiian birth certificate form and had it reported in the
Newspapers, O'Reilly is still "parroting" his false claim and has the
audacity each night to tell America "we're looking out for you." With
such a friend we do not lack for enemies.
He
also maintained silence throughout LTC Terrence Lakin's court-martial for refusing an order until
Obama confirmed his Presidential eligibility. This was in accordance with an
oath taken to defend the Constitution. Though Obama destroyed Lt.Colonel
Lakin's 18 year faithful service to his country
this was kept hidden by the Media. Where were their voices in print and
radio/tv? Lt.Colonel Lakin's trial was reported primarily by World Net Daily,
the Post and E-mail and smaller internet and radio outlets. A man lost his
career for standing up for truth. Meanwhile, Obama traveled all over the
country speaking to minority students who desperately(and deservedly) sought
financial aid for higher education and a better life, yet he ignored a
long-standing offer of Globe Magazine of $100,000 to assist those students if
he produced a valid Certificate of Live Birth. As with Lt. Colonel Lakin, Obama responded with more silence.
An issue of monumental importance-completely suppressed by the Media.
Consider,
also, this late-breaking news. Donald Trump just made an offer of $5,000,000
(that's five million, folk's) to Obama for any cause of his choosing, if he
will produce, by Oct.31, 2012 documents such
as his passport, school records,etc. which can satisfactorily support his
claim of being a "natural-born" American citizen. I would suggest
that Mr.Trump get on the line behind Lt.Colonel Lakin,Globe Magazine,and all
the others awaiting Obama's transparency to exhibit itself.
As a
further example, recently a Georgia judge subpoenad Obama to appear in
court with proof of his eligibility if he wished to appear on the 2012 Georgia
ballot. Obama ignored the subpoena and his attorney brazenly notified the Judge
(in writing) that neither Obama nor his counsel would appear in court to answer
it....and they didn't! Sadly, the Judge ignored the plaintiff's presentation
and simply dismissed the lawsuit without seeing any proof of Obama's
eligibility. Did the Media report this miscarriage of justice? Simply
put....NO!
Finally,
Glenn Beck referred to the actions of questioning Obama's eligibility as
"dumb".
We are speaking about Presidential eligibility, an issue which our beleagured
Founders fought and died for and considered important enough to become the
second article in the Constitution - not a
footnote or suggestion. How "dumb" is it to insist that Obama resolve
this issue by authorizing release of the vault birth certificate, as well as
other relevant documents (1981 Pakistan passport, college records,etc.) The
actions which Beck scorned are simply demands for TRANSPARENCY....that's TRUTH.
Here are
a few more items the Media seems to have overlooked in keeping America
well-informed. The Governor of Hawaii vowed to secure a valid birth certificate
from his Dept.of Health and came up empty-handed! The general
presiding at Lt.Colonel Lakin's court-martial would not allow the colonel's defense team to even suggest that Obama
be required to produce evidence of eligibility; Sheriff Joseph Arpaio of
Arizona, after a long investigative process which resulted in a declaration
that the documents which Obama declared legitimate were fraudulent and most
significant - NO HAWAIIAN hospital will acknowledge Obama's birth in
their facility....that's no, as in none! Oh, yes,
how are things in Libya?
TRANSPARENCY - A WORD OBAMA
PROCLAIMS YET PROSTITUTES
Some
argue if the lawsuits presently in various courts force Obama to release
documents which confirm he is not a "natural-born" American citizen
there will be riots in the streets if he is removed from Office. If he
obtained the Office by deception and fraud why should he be rewarded? Are truth
and honesty no longer desired?
If a Caucasian was found guilty of obtaining the
Presidency in like manner would anyone argue that they should remain in office to avoid Caucasian riots? Obviously, if the
withheld documents could have confirmed Obama's eligibility the Democratic
Party (particularly the vocal members who
presently dismiss the eligibility issue) would have "pressed" him to
release the documents to satisfy America, yet, even 100 lawsuits haven't
induced him to practice the transparency he boasts of possessing. Remember his
oft-quoted statement: "The only
people who don't want to disclose the truth are those with something to
hide."
Obama
recently recommended a "black" website for African-Americans to
visit, to assist his presidential
campaign. His obvious intention: "vote color, not conscience".
Imagine the uproar had Romney touted Caucasion websites for Caucasion Americans
to visit, to assist his campaign. My concern is for one's
character....not their color. Sadly, Obama's character consists of a litany
of lies and deception concerning his so-called presidential
eligibility and fraudulent birth records.
Many
African-American individuals and organizations accept my writings and I theirs. I intended to support Herman Cain until personal
problems forced his exit from the presidential
race. All my letters stress truth about the eligibility issue, so when
politicians of any party casually dismiss this
issue with remarks like "this is not a major issue to me" are they
aware of what they are saying? The person acting as president
of the world's most powerful nation has power to lead America toward prosperity
or ruin, yet, they claim Obama's right to occupy that office
is not a major issue to them. Also, to those who claim his eligibility has
been authenticated by proof he provided, I remind them that proof
consisting of fraudulent and/or ineligible documents is merely proof of fraud
and/or ineligibility. FOR WANT OF A VALID BIRTH CERTIFICATE A NATION MAY BE
LOST!
Four
years ago, I started writing of challenges to Obama's "presumed"
eligibility to seek the office of president. A friend asked if I had stepped into
the political arena. I replied "no-Obama stepped into the religious arena when he said (among other things) that he had no problem
leaving a child born after a "botched" abortion to die, if its mother
so wished! A common practice of Obama's eligibility defenders has been to claim
anyone challenging him is racially motivated. It's a poor defense because the African-American
individuals and organizations challenging him are not racially driven.
On August
20,2012, Obama "pushed" Romney to disclose previous tax returns and
had the audacity to say:"those seeking the White House must know their
life is an open book." "Open book ? This from a man who will not let
anyone even view the opening page of his life....his
birth certificate!
I offer
this suggestion to one of my e-mail recipients, Williard Mitt Romney. If he
wishes to become our next president he need
only offer to submit his tax returns to the American Public (as Obama has been insisting), if Obama, in
return, will submit a valid Certificate of Live Birth, passport and school records (as
America has been insisting) to confirm his presidential
eligibility.
Would
Obama refuse such an offer? Remember, we are speaking of a man who ruined an 18
year military career of an Army officer, refused to obey a subpoena in Georgia,
ignored a $100,000 offer to help African-American students survive and I
don't believe Donald Trump will hear from him.
cc:Members
of the Supreme Court
7 comments:
It is refreshing to me to see that someone feels the way that I do. I can't believe that this important point has not been followed up on by people in authority.The time is running out--I thought that the Supreme Court was supposed to rule on a couple of state petitions as to whether Obama can be placed on their state's ballot.All is quiet!!
Every school kid in the United States knows that you are required to put your hand on your heart when the National Anthem is played. It is a federal statute. (If you don't believe me look it up on line at the Cornell Univ. web site!) The fact that this pseudo-president doesn't even know this about our country, our traditions, is to me a dead giveaway that HE IS NOT AMERICAN!
Being silent may not be the medias only crime. Many investigators have come to the conclusion that the media showed us a special effects movie on 911 and most of the so called witnesses and amateur video makers have now been outed as frauds. Check this out and make up your own mind. Fox got caught. Watch closely and go to the medias own sites to verify what he is showing you here. The evidence is still in plain sight and he gives a compelling argument that the entire TV media was in on the planning and carrying out of 911.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gl8p16YE2YY&list=PLEA05F393EC843D80&index=8&feature=plcp
Re: "Bill O'Reilly of Fox claimed he saw a valid Obama birth certificate but had to retract his claim when informed that what Fox News actually viewed was a fraudulent "Certification of Live Birth" , not a "Certificate of Live Birth", the required document for legitimizing his Presidential eligibility. "
Answer. The Certification of Live Birth is not fraudulent, and it is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year. It is, to be sure, a short form birth certificate, but it is the official birth certificate, and in fact Mitt Romney so far has showed ONLY his short form birth certificate, without even the name of the hospital or the name of the doctor on it.
Obama has shown both his short form birth certificate and his long form birth certificate, and the officials in Hawaii of both parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent it to him and that ALL the facts on it are correct, and this is further confirmed by the public Index Data file and by the birth notices sent to the newspapers of Hawaii by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.
Re: "O'Reilly also said that the two newspaper clippings reporting Obama's "supposed" birth in Hawaii confirmed his eligibility. "
Answer: O'Reilly is accurate. The birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 are good confirming proof to the birth certificate (short form and long form) itself and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties and the Index Data. That is because ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.
Re: "...even after being made aware that in 1961 anyone could have prepared an Hawaiian birth certificate form and had it reported in the Newspapers, O'Reilly is still "parroting" his false claim..."
Answer: But it is not a false claim. The false claim is that "anyone could have prepared a Hawaiian birth certificate form." Only the DOH could do that, as it has said and as the newspapers have said and as the name "Health Bureau Statistics" on the section of the paper indicates. There were no birth notice ads or free notices prepared by relatives, only the notices that the DOH sent to the papers, and the DOH only sent those notices out for the children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 it was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children who were not born in Hawaii.
Continuing:
Some things that show that Obama was born in Hawaii:
1. Obama's two official birth certificates, with the state seals on them. (The official physical copy of the long-form birth certificate was handed around in the White House press room, and one reporter said that she had felt the seal and took a photo of the document. http://turningthescale.net/?p=541)
2. The confirmation of the facts on the two birth certificates (short form and long form)----that Obama was born in Hawaii---by THREE Republican officials in Hawaii and several Democrats, and by the public Index Data file. The acceptance of the written confirmation of the facts on Obama’s birth certificate by the conservative secretary of state of Arizona.
3. The notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 that were sent to the papers “Health Bureau Statistics” section by the DOH of Hawaii----and only the DOH could send those notices. (Also, the claim that the DOH could have been influenced by lying relatives turns out to be false because whenever there was a claim of a birth outside of a hospital, Hawaii insisted on a witness statement.)
4. The absence of a US travel document for Obama in 1961. Nor has there been an application for such a travel document found.
5. The teacher, who recalls being told of Obama's birth in Hawaii in Kapiolani Hospital in 1961 and writing home about it (about the birth to a woman named Stanley to her father, also named Stanley).
6. Obama's Kenyan grandmother said repeatedly in the taped interview that he was BORN IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview (Hartford Courant) that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama's birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.
7. Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and it was rare for women to travel late in pregnancy in those days. WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama’s father remained in Hawaii throughout 1961, which would have meant that she would have had to have made that long, expensive and risky trip without him---and that is hardly likely at all.
http://4peoplewhothink.wordpress.com/2012/04/24/the-belief-factor-by-dan-lynch/
Obama, whose birth certificate was not forged and who really was born in Hawaii NOT IN KENYA---as his birth certificate, and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, and the Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 and the teacher who wrote home about "Stanley had a baby" ALL show----was re-elected president of the United States last night. He won both a majority of the popular vote and a clear majority of the Electoral College vote.
Post a Comment