Dems Admit Obama’s Not Eligible
Weary of defending in court the Constitutional eligibility of their man at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, the Democrat Party has finally admitted Barack Obama is not qualified to be president of the United States– and that it doesn’t matter.
According to a motion filed by Party attorneys in a Tennessee eligibility lawsuit, “…Defendants [the Tennessee Democrat Party and the Democrat National Committee] assert that the Tennessee Democrat Party has the right to nominate whoever it chooses to run as a candidate, including someone who is not qualified for the office.”
In numerous previous lawsuits questioning the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama, Democrats have maintained that voters, not the Constitution, should be the final arbiters of presidential eligibility. Though a disgraceful assertion on its face, such mindless rambling was about all that desperate Democrat attorneys had in their arsenals, apart from the perpetually employed “plaintiffs lack standing” defense.
But now, the cat is out of the bag, and the true sentiments of Democrat Party officials have finally been aired. It seems that, according to the left, as long as the acting president has the requisite contempt for the United States, is willing to work tirelessly to destroy the national economy, and will ignore both the rule of law and his Constitutional duty to enforce it, he is eminently qualified to hold the country’s top job.
In February, Georgia Administrative Judge Michael Malihi ignored Supreme Court precedent, made a shambles of case law, and distorted the rulings of other courts in a pathetically obvious mission to find Barack Obama eligible for the Georgia presidential ballot. Although the first judge to decide an Obama eligibility case on the merits, his contempt for an honest judicial process certainly did nothing to mend the rapidly deteriorating reputation of the American legal system.
On Wednesday, United States District Judge S. Thomas Anderson joined a long list of robed colleagues, ruling that plaintiffs in the Tennessee case “lacked standing” to point out Obama’s Constitutional ineligibility for the presidency. That is, plaintiffs could not claim sufficient personal harm should the Manchurian Candidate remain in or be re-elected to the White House.
Strange how the law works. After 3 ½ years of cynical disregard for the borders, language, and culture of the United States, one would think that some 240 million people have suffered “sufficient personal harm” to claim legal standing for a crack at His Royal Highness in a court of law! There are only 30 million illegals currently residing in the United States, and those the Attorney General refers to as “his people” might actually lack legal standing in the eyes of an honest arbiter.
At any rate, Democrats have finally admitted what the rest of us have known for quite some time. Barack Obama is NOT qualified to hold the job won for him by the national media in 2008. But it seems only the voters will have the authority to reclaim it from him. God willing, the vast majority who exercise that authority in November will be both American and alive.
6 comments:
That's because the U.S. Government is a Corporation., Not a republic, the way it is supposed to be.
Hello!! Even corporations must abide by the law! Being incorporated has nothing to do with it! It is pure, unadulterated corruption, fraud and deceit...nothing more, nothing less.
Politicians can become president. Only leaders can effectively serve as Commander-in-Chief.
Young people serving in our Armed Forces and fighting our wars have more integrity than the person sitting in the White House who has tremendous influence on deciding where they fight and maybe die.
All Veterans and Americans should read 'The Military's Moral Dilemma' article at World Net Daily. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=117857
Young Americans who proudly don uniforms of our armed forces and fight our wars often return from battle crippled or dead. How can Obama stand saluting over the flagged-draped coffins of America's fallen heroes yet he cannot lead them by his example?
Everyone decrying Obama's lack of integrity is justified.
It was Hillary's camp that started the first legal cases against Obama's eligibility two weeks after the 2008 DNC convention. Hillary knew Obama was ineligible. That's why, as the beltway-insider, in early 2008 she yanked him into an intentionally uncomfortable 6-person Senate committee to dig through McCain's eligibility. ‘Initially’ Hillary probably planned to select Obama as her VP choice and surge to a clear victory with a stunning ticket; however, when Obama's own campaign for the WH overtook Mrs. Clinton's, thermo-nuclear war probably began between Dean, Soros, and the Clintons. Two weeks before the election, even Wolf on CNN said "If Obama is found ineligible, can Hilary win on a 2-week run?" The heat was on all the way to the end.
Reid and Pelosi were reluctant on Obama as the Dem candidate and knew joining on the Obama bandwagon could end in prison like Colson got after Watergate. That's why Pelosi distanced herself as best she could by not certifying, at least for Hawaii, that Obama was Constitutionally eligible. She knew he wasn't.
Yes Bush and Cheney most likely knew Obama was ineligible, so did Governor Lingle, so did Howard Dean, so did Aunt Bea and Andy Griffith. Everyone had to bend for two reasons: too many secrets, and to avoid national and international race and religious riots.
For crying out loud, Howard Dean created the largest super majority in a half century and then just a few days after the 2008 election resigns as DNC chair. Why? Answer: Separation. Space. Distance. From what? Ending up like those tangled up in Watergate. Even Blago got his foot tangled in the 2008 grab-bag net.
The bottom-line: Hawaii cannot produce the original piece of microfilm that has the Nordyke twins' full birth certs and Obama's connected to it. Obama's never existed. Everyone knows this to be true.
That's why in 2008 the Hawaii Democratic Party Chair Brian Schatz wouldn't certify Obama as Constitutionally eligible as the Hawaii Dem Party did for Gore in 2000 and for Kerry in 2004. Like many others, to create some legal separation and distance from what was becoming a sticky problem, Brian only cited the DNC Convention guidelines rather than the Constitution regarding Obama's eligibility to run on Hawaii's ballot.
In addition, new legitimate evidence indicates Obama's father is very likely Frank Marshall Davis, not Obama Sr. Where Obama’s mother gave birth to her son is still unclear, but Obama is the splitting image of Frank Davis, and bares no resemblance to Obama Sr. See 'Dreams of My Real Father' documentary video.
John -I do appreciate much of the information you present here but why do you focus so much attention on Obama? Honestly its getting tiresome -we get it already! Discussing his eligibility or ineligibility is a non issue! It is so much bigger than him - he would not be the President of the United States unless he was allowed to be. Why not focus attention on the real problem- the Puppet Masters! Obama has no ability to do anything that is off script for the time being. He does have a family to protect right? By contrast you seem to glance over Mitt's short comings - He's the Cabal's pick of the litter! Maybe even the Vatican's choice for the "BIG" role in their play. What's gong on with the black pope, jesuits, Cheney, P2 masons, Alan Greenspan, Timmy Geithner, Queen, Child trafficking, Boys Town? I'd like to here what's the latest on Leo Wanta, Steve Cotrell, and the White Dragon Society. Thank you
Then go to whitehatsreport.com and read all the reports. This is important that the demonrats finally admitted it. DUH!!!!!!!
Post a Comment