Tuesday, January 24, 2017

'Women’s March on Washington' Should Be Ashamed - But They Are Not!

'Women’s  March  on  Washington'  Should  Be  Ashamed - But  They  Are  Not!  TRUMP  SUPPORTER  EMBARRASSES  WOMEN'S  MARCH!
It was one of the largest protests in the United States, and the size of Saturday’s “Women’s March on Washington” was dwarfed only by the tens of millions of women who voted for President Donald Trump.

But there’s one problem — once these so-called “environmentalists” were done, they left behind huge piles of trash and Starbucks cups and discarded their snarky signs wherever they pleased.

What EVER credibility (IF they even know what that is) that these 
      immature confused idiot women may have had, they lost ALL of it        
with the mess they left behind for OTHERS to clean up after them 
along with their total disrespect for the American people as a 
whole and  for the nation they live in


Footage begins at 1:08.  This video kind of says it all. If anyone has better footage without all the hype at the beginning of this one, send it in and we will publish it. Thanks.


https://thehornnews.com/going-viral-trump-supporter-cleaning-huge-mess-left-womens-march/

OUR READERS JUST WROTE THIS ARTICLE FROM THEIR COMMENTS.... WE HAVE THE BEST READERS ON THE WEB!!!!



OUR READERS JUST WROTE THIS ARTICLE FROM THEIR COMMENTS.... WE HAVE THE BEST & SMARTEST READERS ON THE WEB!!!!


Summary: H.R.193 — 115th Congress (2017-2018) American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017

PLEASE READ FULL ARTICLE ON THE BLOG....

 
This bill repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws.

The bill requires: (1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. 

The bill prohibits: (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.

 

http://82.221.129.208/baasepageq5.html 


From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. ROGERS of Alabama:
H.R. 193.
Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant
to the following:
This legislation is authorized by Article I, Section 8 of
the Constitution: ``To make all laws which shall be necessary
and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers,
and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the
Government of the United States.''
[Page H52]

4 comments:

Where is the announcement of the U.S withdrawing from the League of Nations in Davos, you lemmings?

This is nothing more than lipstick on a pig until the real problem in the outhouse is faced!

The United States of America does not have "Citizens" and leaders.

It has "Slaves" and what are known as Owners. Owned by the Federal Reserve System, is exactly what they are.
http://www.silverdoctors.com/headlines/finance-news/this-is-definitely-an-asset-that-you-want-to-own/

Unquestionably, it will have to be removed like a cancer since the Federal Reserve has written all the rules.
ReplyDelete
Replies
  1. You got that right, you officially cannot trust ANY member of a government.

    They are all liars, including and especially Kennedy who wanted a cashless world. (Should it miss your notice that your leader meets with cashless sponsor Modi?)

    So don't act like government is there for you, you people really must start separating entirely from that.

    Are people losing their minds? Trump is the same, he's only in there because people put his feet to the fire.

    He may be a step in the right direction, but what do you think all of you are? That's right you are citizens and that means you are collateral to the central bank for whatever they deem to extract.

    Are you brainwashed that you don't think you are?

    We don't have a concern as we no longer are citizens AT ALL and intend to keep it that way, which is quite tough. Anyone who enters chamber court is a citizen.

    All the rest of you better wake up.
    All of you are indeed citizens if you in fact are putting service leaders into this bankrupt municipal corporation.

    You cannot belong to both. Nor can you hide!!
    This isn't arguable.
    A citizen belongs to the Federal Reserve/IMF.(New Republiqu)
    A non-citzen or state citizen belongs to the Republic.

    It isn't in dispute, go look it up.
    http://www.teamlaw.net

    You folks need to remember this!
    Delete
Anonymous January 24, 2017 at 12:18 PM
  1. Questions:

    The Pope (the present one is Pope Francis - no 266 and a Jesuit to boot) is a sovereign of the Vatican City.

    He's also leader of a flock of sheep (some poor American sheep gets bitten and assassinated terribly so by his CIA - originally Catholic Intelligence Agency initiated and run by the Jesuits in over 70 Countries)

    1. Considering the idea of followers and their leaders isn't the idea to educate, grow and emulate attributes of such leaders?

    2. What's with populism - does the Pope not like his followers to be independent and sovereign like himself?

    3. Hasn't the dinosaurs in the Vatican understood that humanity has come of age?

    Very recently President Donald Trump gave the American people permission to think with our own minds again. It's hard to understand why so many are complaining about it when the Creator gave it to us.
    ReplyDelete
  2. Trump will also have to have the United States Code officially repealed as to having any bearing on anything in the Republic Union States. The USC still says that anyone that takes an oath of office loses his American citizenship and becomes an agent of the United Nations. Hopefully this House Bill and subsequent change will automatically undo that provision of the USC and put our peace officers back under the Constitution so that they can quit acting like paid foreign mercenaries unlawfully enforcing foreign corporate copyrighted codes and statutes against the sovereign people as if they were actually law, and quit harassing and arresting law abiding Americans that are lawfully exercising their God given rights enumerated and guaranteed under the Constitution for these United states of America. They are called states because they are a state of being, a fabricated construct of organization fabricated by the mind that none of us as sovereign creations of God are obligated to participate in. See the first Judicial Act of 1797. All jurisdiction is based on consent.
    ReplyDelete

Are you ready for this? Benefits of a cashless “digital” money world ???


4213123312THE  SINISTER  AGENDA  BEHIND  THE  WASHINGTON  WAR  ON  CASH

 

FYI - Trump meeting with Indian Prime Minister MODI today at the White House per Fox News - See below.........

 

What the U.S.A. 'gov' traitors are NOT TELLING YOU


It’s kinda sneaking up on us like an East Texas copperhead pit viper. It began to get some wide attention in 2016 with prominent economists and financial media suddenly talking about the wonderful benefits of a “cashless society.” Then the government of Narenda Modi completely surprised his citizens by suddenly announcing withdrawal of larger denomination currency notes from circulation, forcing Indians to put their cash into banks or lose it. Now, everywhere we turn, it seems, someone is arguing the Nirvana benefits of a cashless, “digital” money world. 

It reminds me in an eerie way of a statement attributed to then US Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in the 1970’s. He reportedly stated, “If you control oil, you control entire nations; if you control food, you control the people; if you control money, you control the entire world.” 

CONTROL  

Consider the following in this regard. 

Modi and a USAID ‘Catalyst’

On November 8, 2016 in a surprise televised address, Indian Prime Minister Narenda Modi announced that within a deadline of days all Indian currency notes of 500 and 1,000 Rupees must be put in a bank account and exchanged for smaller denomination notes. At today’s exchange rate 1,000 Rs is roughly equal to $15. This would perhaps be equivalent to the US Treasury outlawing all cash notes larger than a $10 bill.

Overnight, Modi’s government de facto outlawed an estimated 86 percent of all cash in circulation by value. People had 50 days to hand in the notes or they become worthless. Yet the government, despite stating it would issue new, more secure 500Rs and 1000Rs bills, had nowhere near the equivalent value of new notes ready for replacement. They say it may take up to a year to print enough, which means confiscation, de facto. 

Faked opinion polls with slanted questions done only via smart phone apps of which only 17% of the population has access, claimed that “90% of Indians approve” the demonetization.

Yet it’s far worse. India is an underdeveloped country, the largest in the world in population terms with more than 1.3 billion people. By demanding Indians turn in all 500Rs and 1,000Rs bills to banks, Modi is forcing major change in how Indians control their money in a country high on the corruption scale where few trust government let alone private banks, and prefer to deal strictly in cash or hoard gold for value. Nearly half the population, some 600 million Indians, do not hold a bank account and half of those, some 300 million Indians, lack a government identification, necessary to open an account.

When he presented his shock announcement, Modi pitched it in terms of going after India’s black economy. Soon he shifted gears and was praising the benefits of a “cash-less society” to enable Indians to enter the digital age, appealing to younger Indians, savvy in smart phones and digital networks, to convince the older of the benefits of online banking and consuming. 

The drastic demonetization declaration was planned by Modi and five other inner-circle ministers in complete secrecy. Not even the banks were told before. The question is what is behind, or rather who is behind this drastic form of monetary shock therapy?

Beyond Cash

The answer is as sinister as it is suggestive of a larger global agenda by what I call in one of my books the Wall Street “Gods of Money.” The Modi cash-less India operation is a project of the US National Security Council, US State Department and Office of the President administered through its US Agency for International Development (USAID). 

Little surprise, then, that the US State Department spokesman, Mark Toner in a December 1, 2016 press briefing praised the Modi demonetization move stating, “…this was, we believe, an important and necessary step to crack down on illegal actions…a necessary one to address the corruption.”

Keep in mind that USAID today has little to do with aiding poorer countries. By law it must follow the foreign policy agenda of the U.S.A. President’s National Security Council and State Department. It’s widely known as a conduit for CIA money to execute their dirty agendas abroad in places such as Georgia. Notably, the present head of the USAID, Gayle Smith, came to head USAID from her post as Senior Director at the US National Security Council.

German economist and blogger, Norbert Haering, in an extensive well-documented investigation into the background of the bizarre Modi move to a cash-less India, found not only USAID as the key financial source of the project. He also uncovered a snake-pit of organizational vipers being funded by USAID to design and implement the India shock therapy.

USAID negotiated a co-operation with the Modi Indian Ministry of Finance. In October, 2016 in a press release USAID announced it had created and funded something it named 'Project Catalyst'. The title of their report was, “Catalyst: Inclusive Cashless Payment Partnership.” Its stated goal it said was to bring about a “quantum leap” in cashless payment in India.

They certainly did that. Maybe two quantum leaps and some.

If we dig a bit deeper we find that in January 2016, USAID presented the Indian Finance Ministry a report titled, 'Beyond Cash': Why India loves cash and why that matters for financial inclusion. Financial “inclusion” for them means getting all Indians into the digital banking system where their every payment can be electronically tracked and given to the tax authorities or to whomever the government sees fit.

Astonishingly, the report, prepared for USAID by something called the Global Innovation Exchange, admitted that “97% of retail transactions in India are conducted in cash or check; Few consumers use digital payments. Only 11% used debit cards for payments last year. Only 6% of Indian merchants accept digital payments…Only 29 percent of bank accounts in India have been used in the last three months.” The US and Indian governments knew very well what shock they were detonating in India.

The Global Innovation Exchange includes such dubious member organizations as the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, a major donor to the Modi war on cash initiative of USAID. It also includes USAID itself, several UN agencies including UNICEF, UNDP, UNHCR. And it includes the US Department of Commerce and a spooky Maclean, Virginia military contractor called MITRE Corporation whose chairman is former CIA Director, James Rodney Schlesinger, a close associate of Henry Kissinger.

The USAID Project Catalyst in partnership with the Indian Finance Ministry was done, according to the USAID press statement, with a sinister-sounding organization called CashlessCatalyst.org. Among the 35 members of CashlessCatalyst.org are USAID, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, VISA, MasterCard, Omidyar Network of eBay billionaire founder Pierre Omidyar, the World Economic Forum-center of the globalization annual Alpine meetings.

War on Cash

However, a most interesting member of the USAID Project Catalyst together with the Indian Ministry of Finance is something called Better Than Cash Alliance. In point of fact the US-government-finance Project Catalyst grew out of a longer cooperation between USAID, the Washington-based Better Than Cash Alliance and the Indian Ministry of Finance. It appears to be the core public driver pushing the agenda of the global “war on cash.”

India and the reckless (or corrupt) Modi government implementing the USAID-Better Than Cash Alliance agenda is clearly serving as a guinea pig in a mass social experiment about how to push the cash war in other countries. The Better Than Cash Alliance is described by the UNCDF, which is its Secretariat, as “a US $38 million global alliance of governments, private sector and development organizations committed to accelerating the shift from cash to electronic payments.”

The Better Than Cash Alliance website announces that the alliance, created in 2012, is a “partnership of governments, companies, and international organizations that accelerates the transition from cash to digital payments in order to reduce poverty and drive inclusive growth.” It’s housed at the UN Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) in New York whose major donors, in turn, surprise, surprise, are the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and MasterCard Foundation. Among the Better Than Cash Alliance’s 50 members are, in addition to the Gates Foundation, Citi Foundation (Citigroup), Ford Foundation, MasterCard, Omidyar Network, United States Agency for International Development, and Visa Inc.

Recently the European Central Bank, which has held negative interest rates for more than a year, allegedly to stimulate growth in the Eurozone amid the long-duration banking and economic crisis of almost nine years, announced that it will stop printing the €500 note. They claim it’s connected with money laundering and terror financing, though it ominously echoes the Modi India war on cash. Former US Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, whose shady role in the 1990’s rape of Russia through his Harvard cronies has been documented elsewhere, is calling for eliminating the US $100 bill. These are first steps to future bolder moves to the desired Cash-less society of Gates, Citigroup, Visa et al.

US Dual Standard: Follow the money…

The move to a purely digital money system would be Big Brother on steroids. It would allow the relevant governments to monitor our every money move with a digital trail, to confiscate deposits in what now are legal bank “bail-ins” as was done in Cyprus in 2013. If central banks move interest rates into negative, something the Bank of Japan and ECB in Frankfurt are already doing, citizens have no choice than to spend the bank money or lose. It is hailed as a way to end tax avoidance but it is far, far more sinister.

As Norbert Haering notes, “the status of the dollar as the world’s currency of reference and the dominance of US companies in international finance provide the US government with tremendous power over all participants in the formal non-cash financial system. It can make everybody conform to American law rather than to their local or international rules.” He adds, referring to the recent US Government demand that Germany’s largest bank, Deutsche Bank, pay an astonishing and unprecedented $14 billion fine, “Every internationally active bank can be blackmailed by the US government into following their orders, since revoking their license to do business in the US or in dollar basically amounts to shutting them down.”

We should add to this “benevolent concern” of the US Government to stimulate a War on Cash in India and elsewhere the fact that while Washington has been the most aggressive demanding that banks in other countries enact measures for full disclosure of details of Swiss or Panama or other “offshore” secret account holders or US nationals holding money in foreign banks, the USA itself has scrupulously avoided demanding the same of its domestic banks. The result, as Bloomberg noted following the suspiciously-timed Panama Papers offshore “leaks” of May, 2016, is that the United States is rapidly becoming the world’s leading tax and secrecy haven for rich foreigners.

Perversely enough, in 2010 the US passed a law, the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act, or FACTA, that requires financial firms to disclose foreign accounts held by US citizens and report them to the US IRS tax office or the foreign banks face steep penalties. The EU signed on to the intrusive FACTA despite strong resistance. Then, using FACTA as the model, the Paris-based OECD drafted an even tougher version of FACTA in 2014 to allegedly go after tax avoiders. To date 97 countries have agreed to the tough OECD bank disclosure rules. Very few have refused. The refusers include Bahrain, Nauru, Vanuatu—and…the United States.

World’s Biggest Tax Haven

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist, a financial wizard or a Meyer Lansky to see a pattern. Washington forces disclosure of secret bank accounts of its citizens or companies abroad, while at the same time lifting control or disclosure inside the United States of private banking accounts. No surprise that such experienced private bankers as London’s Rothschild & Co. have opened offices in Reno Nevada a stone’s throw from Harrah’s and other casinos, and according to Bloomberg, is doing a booming business moving the fortunes of wealthy foreign clients out of offshore havens such as Bermuda, or Switzerland which are subject to the new OECD international disclosure requirements, into Rothschild-run trusts in Nevada, which are exempt from those disclosure rules.

Rothschild & Co. Director Andrew Penney noted that, as a result, the United States today, “is effectively the biggest tax haven in the world.” Today Nevada, Meyer Lansky’s money laundering project of the 1930’s with established legalized gambling, is becoming the “new Switzerland.” Wyoming and South Dakota are close on the heels.

One area where America’s institutions are still world class is in devising complex instruments of financial control, asset theft and cyber warfare. The US War on Cash, combined with the US Treasury and IRS war on offshore banking is their latest model. As Washington’s War on Terror had a sinister, hidden agenda, so too does Washington’s War on Cash. It’s something to be avoided at all costs if we human beings are to retain any vestige of sovereignty or autonomy. It will be interesting to see how vigorously Casino mogul Trump moves to close the US tax haven status. What do you bet he doesn’t?

F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook.”

http://journal-neo.org/2017/01/21/the-sinister-agenda-behind-the-washington-war-on-cash/

DO YOU WANT THE CHEMTRAILS GONE???


"Trump Promises End of Chemtrails"

Russian foreign minister says Trump and Putin see eye-to-eye on foreign affairs because they both want to defeat ISIS and avoid 'interfering in other countries'

President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin see eye to eye when it comes to many foreign policy goals, Russia's foreign minister said today.

Sergey Lavrov was speaking at a news conference with his Hungarian counterpart Peter Szijjarto.

'We have been following the situation in the US,' Lavrov said. 'We can see that many of the major foreign policy issues that Donald Trump has mentioned overlap with what President Putin has been saying about Russia's foreign policy priorities.

'Donald Trump seems to focus on advancing the United States' core interests rather than promoting various ideas and interfering in other countries' internal affairs. This is actually the essence of Russia's foreign policy.'

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Monday that President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin see eye-to-eye on foreign affairs
Lavrov said that Trump and Putin see the fight against ISIS as a 'major priority'

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Monday that President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin see eye-to-eye on foreign affairs
Lavrov added that Russia and Trump share the goal of defeating Islamic State. He called the fight against ISIS 'a major priority' for both the United States and Russia.

Lavrov said, however, that he wants to wait until Trump's team is 'completely formed' and the administration 'officially clarifies its position on the main global issues' before moving forward, TASS reported. 

Larvrov said that he wants to wait until Trump's team is 'completely formed' before speaking with the administration

Larvrov said that he wants to wait until Trump's team is 'completely formed' before speaking with the administration

The foreign minister said that the Obama Administration formed some 'red flags and minefields' before leaving office, making communication between Moscow and Washington, DC, 'seriously complicated'.

He said Russia is ready to bring relations between the countries 'back to normal'. 
'It will only be possible if relations are based on equality, mutual respect and the search for the balance of interests in the fields where we have common goals, such as the war on terror,' he added.

Trump, who has praised Putin, has signaled he wants to improve strained ties with Russia despite US intelligence agencies alleging the Kremlin chief ordered a cyber campaign to help him beat rival Hillary Clinton to the White House.

Russia denies it tried to sway the US election by hacking or other means. It has also dismissed as a fabrication a dossier written by a former British spy which suggested Moscow had collected compromising information about Trump.

Lavrov dismissed the dossier's author, Christopher Steele, as 'a fugitive charlatan from MI6' and said the dossier looked like part of a campaign to cause problems for Trump and his allies. Putin last week called the same dossier a hoax.

While cautioning that the new US administration would need to settle in before wider conclusions could be drawn, Lavrov signalled he was encouraged by the tenor of the Trump team's statements so far which he said suggested it would be possible to have a pragmatic relationship.

Lavrov was speaking at a news conference with his Hungarian counterpart Peter Szijjarto on Monday
Lavrov was speaking at a news conference with his Hungarian counterpart Peter Szijjarto on Monday

'Trump has a particular set of views which differ a lot from his predecessor,' said Lavrov, who accused the Obama administration of wrecking co-operation across a swath of areas and of trying to recruit Russian diplomats as agents.
'By concentrating on a pragmatic search for mutual interests we can solve a lot of problems.'

On Tuesday, Putin took a parting shot at the Obama administration accusing it of trying to undermine Trump's legitimacy with fake allegations and 'binding the president-elect hand and foot to prevent him from fulfilling his election promises'.

Putin voiced hope that 'common sense will prevail' and Russia and the United States will be able to normalize relations once Trump takes office Friday.
'I don't know Mr Trump,' Putin said. 'I have never met him and I don't know what he will do on the international arena. I have no reason whatsoever to assail him, criticize him for something, or defend him.'

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4147898/Russian-foreign-minister-says-Trump-Putin-agree.html

Now baby food and biscuits are linked to cancer: Food watchdog issues alerts for 25 big brands after claiming that crunchy roast potatoes and toast could cause the disease

Tests on best-selling crisps, biscuits and baby food showed raised levels of a chemical linked to cancer.

The health alert comes just 24 hours after an official watchdog warned of the risks of eating burnt toast and roast potatoes. 

The latest products on the danger list include Kettle Chips, Burts crisps, Hovis, Fox’s biscuits, Kenco coffee, McVitie’s and products from Cow & Gate.
A number of big name brand products contain raised levels of acrylamide, a chemical linked to cancer, according to the Food Standards Agency
A number of big name brand products contain raised levels of acrylamide, a chemical linked to cancer, according to the Food Standards Agency
According to the Food Standards Agency, 25 products have raised levels of acrylamide. 

Animal studies suggest the chemical can trigger DNA mutations and cancer.
The link to acrylamide was also behind the warning over fried, roasted and toasted foods such as potatoes and bread.

The agency cautioned that any risk to humans related to lifetime consumption and not occasional eating. 

However a renowned statistician yesterday insisted the link to cancer in humans from acrylamide was extremely weak.

There is no good evidence of harm from humans consuming acrylamide in their diet,’ said Professor David Spiegelhalter.
 
The FSA and other watchdogs in Europe test supermarket food to assess whether acrylamide levels are above a suggested limit – IV, for indicative value.
Of 526 products in targeted tests in 2014 and 2015, 25 had raised levels. Although the agency is not advising consumers to stop eating the products, the manufacturers have been told to cut the levels.

The FSA said: ‘For all of these samples we followed up with the manufacturers or brand owners via local authority inspectors. 

'They alerted them to the findings and requested information about what is being done to control acrylamide in those products. 

'We would emphasise though that the indicative values are not legal maximum limits nor are they safety levels. 

'They are performance indicators and designed to promote best practice in controlling acrylamide levels.’

A Hovis granary loaf, pictured, is one of the products that has higher levels of the chemical, which has been known to cause DNA mutations in animals
A Hovis granary loaf, pictured, is one of the products that has higher levels of the chemical, which has been known to cause DNA mutations in animals

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4149890/Now-baby-food-biscuits-linked-cancer.html

Proof of the blatant dishonesty of the mainstream media


Proof  of  the  blatant  dishonesty  of  the  mainstream  media



Sunday, January 22, 2017
Jim Fetzer

Proof the media, including The New York Times, are playing photographic games with the public. 

These photos (from The New York Times) are shown here in chronological order, but the media has been using the first as the basis for claiming that Trump had a vastly smaller turn out than Obama! 

Not only is that false for the gathering on the mall at the time, but the world-wide television viewing audience was over whelmingly greater. 

Trump does not care about the difference in numbers but that the media has blatantly displayed its dishonesty in reporting.

Photo (1): Widely disseminated to create impression of smaller Trump crowd:


  
Photo (2): Another comparison using a photo taken closer to the inauguration:
 























Photo (3): Photo taken at time time of the inauguration (exposing the scam):



This is a simple scam: use photos taken earlier before everyone has arrived as though they had been taken at the time of the inauguration. It is a stunning indictment of the mainstream media that, in spite of the proof to the contrary, it is promoting a false account of the facts of the matter, which justifies the strong outraged response by Trump's Press Secretary. I agree with him. The media has lost all sense of integrity and responsibility. Its conduct is shameful and wrong.

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2017/01/proof-of-blatant-dishonesty-of.html

Monday, January 23, 2017

H.R.193 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)


H.R.193 - American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017 

115th Congress (2017-2018)

Sponsor:Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3] (Introduced 01/03/2017)
Committees:House - Foreign Affairs
Latest Action:01/03/2017 Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.  (All Actions)

Tracker:

 


From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. ROGERS of Alabama:
H.R. 193.
Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant
to the following:
This legislation is authorized by Article I, Section 8 of
the Constitution: ``To make all laws which shall be necessary
and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers,
and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the
Government of the United States.''
[Page H52]
 

There is one summary for H.R.193. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:  https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193
Introduced in House (01/03/2017)

Summary: H.R.193 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
 
This bill repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws.

The bill requires: (1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. 

The bill prohibits: (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.

 

http://82.221.129.208/baasepageq5.html 


From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. ROGERS of Alabama:
H.R. 193.
Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant
to the following:
This legislation is authorized by Article I, Section 8 of
the Constitution: ``To make all laws which shall be necessary
and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers,
and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the
Government of the United States.''
[Page H52]

TRUMP CLEANS HOUSE WITH UN BILL



TRUMP CLEANS HOUSE WITH UN BILL

 
Before Trump was inaugurated, he already took steps to find out who his enemies were by having congressman Mike Rogers of Alabama submit the following so it could be ready on day one of his presidency. 

Here is the abstract:

American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017

This bill repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws.

The bill requires: 
(1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and 
(2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.

The bill prohibits: 

(1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., 
(2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, 
(3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, 
(4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and 
(5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.
_____________________________

Obviously Trump does not expect this to pass. But, by having this submitted, he will in one easy step know who will work with him or against him. BRILLIANT. The full text is HERE   https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193



Sponsor:  
Rep. Rogers, Mike D. [R-AL-3] (Introduced 01/03/2017)
Committees: House - Foreign Affairs
Latest Action: 01/03/2017 Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.  (All Actions)

Summary: H.R.193 — 115th Congress (2017-2018)

There is one summary for H.R.193. Bill summaries are authored by CRS.

Shown Here:  Introduced in House (01/03/2017)

American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017
 
This bill repeals the United Nations Participation Act of 1945 and other specified related laws. 

The bill requires: 
(1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and 
(2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations. 

The bill prohibits:
(1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., 
(2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, 
(3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation,
(4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and 
(5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/193

***********************************************************************

Republican Congressmen Sponsor Bill To Remove U.S. From The United Nations


House Republicans have introduced H.R. 193, the “American Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2017,” a bill that seeks to remove the United States from the United Nations.



If passed, the bill would cut funding to the UN, and withdrawal the U.S. from the United Nations Participation Act of 1945. The legislation is backed by Rep. Mike D. Rogers (R-Ala.) with co-sponsors, Rep. Walter B. Jones Jr. (R-N.C.), Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.), Rep. Jason Smith (R-Mo.), Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), Rep. John J.Duncan Jr. (R-Tenn.), and Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.).

The bill has not passed the Committee, House or Senate yet.

The American Sovereignty Act was proposed first in 2009, then in 2013, and then again in 2015, and it failed to pass the Committee. Now that Republicans have control of both houses of Congress, could the bill finally pass?

President Trump called for the U.S. to withdraw from NATO and the United Nations during his campaign for his presidency.

Trump also tweeted out “The United Nations has such great potential but right now it is just a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time. So sad!”

Trump added, “As to the UN, things will be different after Jan. 20th,” referring to the day he was inaugurated.

Will 2017 be the year that the U.S. is removed from the United Nations, an organization that is pushing for the 2030 Agenda? You can read the full bill here. Excerpts are below:
“The bill would require: (1) the President to terminate U.S. membership in the United Nations (U.N.), including any organ, specialized agency, commission, or other formally affiliated body; and (2) closure of the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.
The bill prohibits: (1) the authorization of funds for the U.S. assessed or voluntary contribution to the U.N., (2) the authorization of funds for any U.S. contribution to any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (3) the expenditure of funds to support the participation of U.S. Armed Forces as part of any U.N. military or peacekeeping operation, (4) U.S. Armed Forces from serving under U.N. command, and (5) diplomatic immunity for U.N. officers or employees.”
ority Statement
 
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
By Mr. ROGERS of Alabama: H.R. 193.
Congress has the power to enact this legislation pursuant to the following:
This legislation is authorized by Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution: ``To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States.''
[Page H52]

  
http://wearechange.org/republican-congressmen-sponsor-bill-remove-u-s-united-nations/